Friday, August 28, 2009

Learning and You (or me, as the case may be)

I really wanted to find the lolcatz photo with the books that says learn me some informashun for this post, but alas, i could not. So as you're reading this post, keep that picture in mind. If you find it, send me a link. I'll give you a cookie.

If you don't know what lolcatz is, go here and watch hours of your life disappear.

In other news, it's official: I'm an existentialist. Or at least, according to Gardner's multiple intelligences test. I am curious about the standard deviation among different versions of the test, because according to this round, I am only half logical.

That is, in part how I learn; or at least why. I guess that's a motivational thing. We have been discussing the different things that influence learning: learning strategies, multiple intelligences, motivations.

I tend to be motivated to learn by a diverse number of things--I don't think any of them are extrinsic, save for social learning, but we will get to that in a moment. Most of my learning is curiosity: wanting to know who Archimedes is or how texting works or etc. etc. Of course, a discussion like this inherently relates to my social sphere, as our curiosities and desires are informed by the people around us. So often times I set out to learn something when someone mentions or references information with which i am unfamiliar.

It's very hard for me to draw the line here between what I want to learn through disposition (nature, if you will) and social pressure (nature). Multiple Intelligences is, to me, the conglomerate of these two ideas: I tend to appreciate bigger questions (existentialism), social relevance and self-improvement (intrapersonal), and writing and discourse (verbal). I'm also definitely a visual learner and writer: show, not tell, as the old adage goes. All of this really means that I find little time for minutia.

I had never heard of the general strategies for processing information, so that is new to me. I have however, spent the last few weeks going through one overrun hard drive on my computer that has acted as a reservoir, and so I am definitely acquainted with the actual practice. It seems redundant to say that I organize information, given that that is the designated function of the brain, but I definitely am a classifier. I rarely rehearse things--I typically am more of an 'in the moment' thinker and speaker. I do elaborate on topics extensively--usually toward the point where two distinct concepts overlap, to create a point of reference, which is usually why I think in terms of philosophies more than functions, and also why I demonstrated a tendency toward existential thinking.

The End.

1 comment:

  1. Crap so i had typed out all my comment and my laptop shut down!...... it went something like this...

    I noticed that in class and in your blog that you seemed surprised, as many of us were, that your MI was different from what it had been previously. So I wanted to present my little one minute theory I came up with during class. Varied results can be due to the test itself and the person. Questions can be asked in different ways that can influence your respnse or non-response. Also the way we interpret the question changes from person to person, (you wonder: is it asking, outdoors camping or outdoors my front lawn?) The second reason for discrepencies in results has to do with the person. The person can answer questions differently depending on thier feelings or mood. So this along with the fact that MI change overtime can be the reason why a couple of months ago I was a kinesthetic learner and now I am Intrapersonal. Anyway this is a long comment. See you!

    ReplyDelete